快三彩票 - 快三彩票

来源：快三彩票2024-03-22 17:48

“摩托大军”变迁彰显时代进步（中国道路中国梦）******

　　“以前过年回家骑摩托车，从广州回广西藤县要八九个小时，现在坐动车两小时就到家了，关键是安全、舒服，不用受风吹雨淋之苦。”这是一名返乡人的真实感受，也是“摩托大军”中不少人的共同心声。今年春节前后，广东、广西间321国道上骑着摩托车返乡、返工的“摩托大军”不复往年盛况，规模正在逐渐减少。

　　过去，“摩托大军”备受关注。众多摩托骑行者相约同行、满载年货，成为春运期间的独特图景。据广东省交通运输部门统计，高峰时返回各省份的“摩托大军”规模曾经超过100万人。怀揣着一份回家过年的期盼，他们通宵达旦骑行，从珠三角向家的方向前进。如今，无论是国道边的加油站，还是高速路上的收费站，相关工作人员都说很少见到摩托车扎堆了。这一交通之“变”，折射着国家发展之“进”。

　　“摩托大军”规模缩减，背后是中国交通尤其是高铁的发展进步。党的十八大以来，铁路建设者逢山开路、遇水架桥，我国铁路运营里程增长约5.3万公里。目前，我国高铁运营里程突破4万公里。尤其是近年来贵广、南广高铁的开通，连接起两广间铁路交通，不仅有效减少了通行时间，更实现了运输能力的快速增长。数据显示，开通高铁前，两广间每天单向运输能力约3万位，高铁开通后，如今春运高峰期间提升至近20万位。曾经火车票“一票难求”，而如今的高铁票，则随着运力的增长供应充足，让“常回家看看”更易实现。

　　“摩托大军”规模缩减，也见证了群众生活水平的提升。过去，务工人员选择骑摩托车返乡，既是由于春运车票紧张，也是出于节约费用的考虑。随着收入水平不断提升，务工人员出行也更加注重安全性、舒适性、时效性。过年返乡的方式从骑摩托“走得了”向乘高铁“走得好”转变，实则是一种出行观念的改变，折射出人们对美好生活的追求。除了运力提升外，铁路服务也在持续升级，特别是近年来互联网购票、列车网上订餐、电子客票等系列便民服务推出，以及铁路部门与地方政府、社会各界联合开行“温暖回家路”返乡爱心专列，这些举措都让务工人员的返乡路更加便捷、舒适、温馨。

　　“一个流动的中国，充满了繁荣发展的活力。”春运期间，铁路部门的服务保障关系千家万户，必须统筹做好春运组织和疫情防控工作，按照“适需安排、应急有备、精准匹配、梯次投放”的模式阶段性安排春运运能。一趟又一趟安全有序的列车，必将承载着人民群众的获得感不断向前，为沿线城乡发展注入新的动力。

　　(作者为中国铁路南宁局集团有限公司党委宣传部部长刘剑)

快三彩票

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.